Puig attributes STAAR scores to ‘disparity’between classroom rigor and testing rigor

BY ROBERT MORALES

CCAISD Trustees on Monday listened to a 25-minute presentation from Secondary Principal Kittie Gibson about the latest STAAR test scores, and the overall results tend to indicate that improvement is needed.

The results are as follows, beginning with Eagle Elementary:
3rd Grade Reading:  2013 – 92%, 2014 –71%
3rd Grade Math:  2013 – 92%, 2014 – 86%
4th Grade Reading:  2013 – 63%, 2014 – 77% (Of the 2014 passers, 60% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 0% met progress measure
4th Grade Math:  2013 – 54%, 2014 – 81% (Of the 2014 passers, 62% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 20% met progress measure

4th Grade Writing:  2013 – 58%, 2014 – 85%

The results for Secondary are as follows:
5th Grade Reading:  2013 – 84%, 2014 – 67% (Of the 2014 passers, 50% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 58% met progress measure
5th Grade Math:  2013 – 2013 – 84%, 2014 – 50% (Of the 2014 passers, 28% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 44% met progress measure
5th Grade Science:  2013 – 58%, 2014 – 46%
6th Grade Reading:  2013 – 55%, 2014 – 65% (Of the 2014 passers, 40% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 17% met progress measure
6th Grade Math:  2013 – 48%, 2014 – 65% (Of the 2014 passers, 17% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 0% met progress measure
7th Grade Reading:  2013 – 81%, 2014 – 69% (Of the 2014 passers, 77% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 64% met progress measure
7th Grade Math:  2013 – 57%, 2014 – 41% (Of the 2014 passers, 31% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 53 % met progress measure
7th Grade Writing:  2013 – 64%, 2014 – 53%
8th Grade Reading:  2013 – 96%, 2014 – 85% (Of the 2014 passers, 61% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 40% met progress measure
8th Grade Math:  2013 – 50%, 2014 – 58% (Of the 2014 passers, 74% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 71% met progress measure
8th Grade Social Studies:  2013 – 60%, 2014 – 55%

8th Grade Science:  2013 – 60%, 2014 – 55%

End of Course Assessments (EOC):
Algebra I: 2013 – 71%, 2014 75% (Of the 2014 passers, 40% met progress measure; of the 2014 non-passers, 25% met progress measure
English I:  2013 Writing – 56%, 2013 Reading – 61%, 2014 – (first year for reading and writing in one exam) 54%
English II:  2013 Writing – 58%, 2013 Reading – 64%, 2014 – (first year for reading and writing in one exam) 61%

U.S. History:  2014 – 81%

“It’s great when you point those that are making progress,” said Trustee Lisa Cottrell. “Some of those numbers are high, and that’s encouraging, but it is quite alarming to me that we are below regional and state average [at almost every category], and that’s a real problem. I know that our staff is doing a great job, and I know that we’re dealing with these changes from the state, but when we can’t hit regional averages, it’s quite alarming.”

Ms. Cottrell also questioned why students are two years behind in a particular grade level.

“Do we not have retention anymore?  When you have students that are two years behind, it’s not even fair to that student to continue to push [him or her]. When you have a 5th grader now going into 6th grade, they can’t even survive in the elementary grade level. I just don’t know if it’s fair.”

Superintendent Marc Puig explained that the grades students receive in the classroom during the six weeks’ periods are passing; however, the test scores reveal a different story.

“We have a disparity between what the students are earning on their tests, and what they’re earning in the classroom. The only grades where you hold anyone behind because of testing are the 5th and 8th grades. What we have to do is to ramp up the rigor [in the classroom] to the rigor of the test so that there’s more of an alignment between what you see on the test.”

He said that it is “frustrating” to see kids passing in the classroom, but at testing time, the students don’t pass, or they perform lower than where they should.

“Somewhere we’re missing,” responded Ms. Cottrell. “I know that our staff is doing a great job, but somewhere, either we’re slacking a little bit in the classroom or we’re giving too many opportunities to try and try again, but somewhere, we’re missing it.”

Mr. Puig said that the district will take time for the level of instruction to reach a level of the rigor of the tests.

“I think the biggest takeaway of this story is what Ms. Gibson mentioned,” said Mr. Puig. “Now, instead of ‘you’re a failure, Marc,’ you know what, you didn’t make it, but you did grow a year. I think this is what we have to watch closely. When we get to the point that we’re seeing too many zeroes in progress, then we have a problem.”

Mr. Puig added that CCAISD students, in order to perform well, must have high-quality teachers at the helm every day. “We have to make sure we’re providing the support, such as professional development, to address the new curriculum,” he said.

Trustee Sandy Urias said that overcrowding in the classroom should be considered a factor in the scores.

“A lot of these students were crammed in a room, and you expect the teachers to teach at a certain when students are at different levels. Sure you want students to be at one level so that the grades and the scoring can be what they’re supposed to be. This year alone, my 5th grader was stressed out because of the cramming of students at the junior high.”

In other action, at the beginning of the meeting, Mr. Puig recognized Nancy Balcazar as Employee of the Year, and Alison Corrales as Secondary Teacher of the Year. Both were present to receive awards. Toni Turnbow, not present, was awarded Elementary Teacher of the Year.

Trustees approved:
•Approval of 2014-2015 Student Insurance Renewal
•Approval of sale of property (the former Bud’s Diesel building) to Vance Cottrell
•2013-2014 End of Year budget amendments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here